THE CULL BBC3 CAMPAIGN
Join the campaign, sign the petition, and together let’s take on Television Centre and all its cant!
John Stuart Mill was right – push-pin isn’t as good as poetry. And funnily enough, neither’s 2 Pints Of Lager And A Packet Of Crisps. And the same goes for Nicola Roberts: The Truth About Tanning. And even Hotter Than My Daughter.
Why shouldn’t we want rid of public service broadcasting that’s devoid of any worthwhile public service whatsoever?
Should the purpose of the BBC really be to produce such debasing trash?
How do you feel about your money paying for a programme that’s essentially a beauty contest/sexual rivalry between a mother and her daughter?
To sign the petition, leave your name and where you’re from in the Comments box below.
Comrades, ya vas lyublyu.
Currer
PS If you’re new to The Currer Ball, here’s the original article that inspired the campaign:
The campaign to cull BBC3 starts here!
Good news this week. And by good news I don’t mean the kind that’s dished out by Russell Howard on BBC3. I’ve recently been told that Russell Howard’s Good News is in fact insightful socio-political commentary for the sophisticated and progressive youth audience of contemporary Britain. But of course! And here’s me thinking it’s just a dressed up, re-hashed, poor man’s You’ve Been Framed, YouTube clip after YouTube clip accompanied by Howard’s heard-it-all-before, yet somehow so uniquely humourless, annotations. I’m almost embarrassed to say it now, but I honestly used to think that Russell Howard’s Good News was a great advert for eye-gauging. But I can see clearly now. The rain has gone. Nothing to worry about. Because it’s all good news and insightful socio-political commentary. In-between some web footage of a black Labrador doing the moonwalk.
I know what you’re thinking: ‘Currer, you’re just jealous. Howard’s doing quite nicely for himself, thank you very much. But what about you? It’s been a quiet few months, hasn’t it? You’re like a bird that can’t fly. That just skulks about on the barren soil of WordPress, scratching itself. Don’t fret about Howard. Take a look in the mirror, Currer. Try spreading those wings.’
And you know what? You’re right. I’ll admit it: I am jealous of Howard. Profoundly jealous. No doubt about it. But that being said, it doesn’t alter the absolute fact that Russell Howard’s Good News makes The One Show look like a pensive engagement in high culture. Or Live At Studio Five like broadcasting gold.
By the way, for those of you who’ve never seen Russell Howard’s Good News, just consider for a second what a poor man’s You’ve Been Framed might look like. The mind boggles.
Anyway, apologies for the rant. Where were we? Oh, yeah: the good news. The BBC’s finally decided to slim down its rather portly portfolio. 2 digital radio stations (the Asian Network and 6Music) and about half of the BBC’s Byzantine website are closing down.
Hardly swingeing cuts then. More like gesture-politics actually. The annual spend on those 2 radio stations is about £5 million apiece – in other words, a rounding error for any one of the BBC’s on-going and over-budget building projects. The suspicion is that the BBC’s pre-empting the post-election prospect of a new Tory government rocking up to Television Centre and demanding a root-and-branch second look at how the BBC spends our money.
But the problem here isn’t so much the politics behind the cuts. Or that the cuts don’t go nearly far enough. Because there’s another much bigger issue at stake. And it’s this: why on earth didn’t the BBC use this opportunity to cull BBC3, probably the worst channel on British television? How egregious does the quality of its programming have to plunge for BBC3 to cease transmission? Of how infinitesimally little worth does BBC3 have to get before its execs figure out what any license fee payer with half a brain realised after series 1, episode 1 of 2 Pints Of Lager And A Packet Of Crisps? i.e. that BBC3’s at least 95 percent woeful and a prostitution of tax payers money.
Let me give you an idea of what I’m talking about. Here’s just a flavour of BBC3’s ‘output’ – to use the industry jargon – over the last few months. Brace yourselves:
Most Annoying People; Most Annoying People: 2009 Cutdowns (you’ve got to question whether Most Annoying People merited a spin off show); Cannabis: Britain’s Secret Farms; Eastenders: The Greatest Cliffhangers; Horne And Corden (it’s rumoured that this priceless double act’s split up – if that spares us the misfortune of a second series, I certainly hope so); Hotter Than My Daughter (regrettably, I’m not joking); Coming of Age (sounds quite profound, doesn’t it? It’s not); Vampires: Why They Bite; Snog Marry Avoid? (answer: avoid); 2 Pints Of Lager And A Packet Of Crisps (almost incredibly now into its eighth series – quit flogging, that horse’s well and truly dead); Summer Heights High; News In 60 Seconds (beyond parody; see News 25 for my best effort); Scallywagga (another one of those hilarious sketch shows that reflects the diversity of edgy urban life); Greek Uncovered; The World’s Toughest Driving Tests (and yet, you wouldn’t have automatically thought there’s a programme to made there); This Is Jinsy; Dancing On Wheels; Young Dumb And Living Off Mum (the world’s going to hell in a BBC3 producer’s handbag); Nicola Roberts: The Truth About Tanning (a word of advice for Nicola, the red-head from Girls Aloud: don’t ever leave the band to start a solo career. Call it a hunch, but I just can’t see that working out); Last Woman Standing; The Gemma Factor; and Russell Howard’s Good News (series 2 gets going soon).
Let’s pause for a second while we consider what we’ve just heard.
Mark Thompson, the BBC Director-General, was on Newsnight this week. Paxo asked him why BBC3 avoided any cuts. Thompson’s reply was that BBC3’s given us Little Britain and Gavin And Stacey.
Now, maybe you don’t happen to think that Gavin And Stacey’s quite overrated, and that Little Britain’s at best average, and relies a bit too much on grating catchphrases, squeamishness, and morbidly obese nudity, to compensate for the absence of consistently good writing. Maybe you think that Gavin And Stacey and Little Britain are the best thing since bread came sliced. But even if you genuinely think that, is BBC3’s track record of 2 success stories amidst 6 years of gargantuan guff, including a show called Hotter Than My Daughter, is it really enough to justify the existence of an otherwise worthless channel?
And who says that we need BBC3 to produce good comedy anyway? Isn’t that what BBC2 used to do? Why should license fee payers need to fork out for a testing ground that’s watched almost exclusively by impressionable / already moronic teenagers? We didn’t need BBC3 for The Office or Partridge or every single other great sitcom made before 2003.
You know, I’m not one for banning things. Free country and all that. But now and again something comes along that my complete contempt for means that normal rules don’t apply. BBC3’s one of those things. Hotter Than My Daughter? Snog Marry Avoid? Young, Dumb and Living Off Mum? Can you believe that we’re actually paying for this shite? I fail to see the good news.
Alright, consider me officially signed on. But after my afternoon nap, I’m starting a petition for you to grow back your hair.
-from the californian. x
Why stop at BBC3, I’d ditch the whole lentil munching lot….tossers.
2 Pints Of Lager And A Packet Of Crisps is something that college students would post on youtube…programming FAIL. lolz
I hate admitting that you may have convinced me!
BBC3 actually started out as a pretty decent channel, where interesting comedy programmes were given a chance that they may not have otherwise had e.g. The Mighty Boosh
Then someone at BBC3 saw E4 and copied it.
To add to this, BBC Two also used to do much of what BBC Four does now – highbrow, quality dramas and documentaries. Do you think they should axe BBC Four as well and let BBC Two go back to its roots completely?
I think that you’re probably right. It’s a shame that BBC4 has to exist because BBC2′s busy producing cookery shows featuring ex-catwalk models.
I see your point Currer. Nice rant!
Someone once said 90% of everything is shit – it’s probably 97% with BBC3.
I agree the monkeys-with-brains-commissioning- editors should be killed and replaced – as they should do at C4 – but maybe we should campaign for better programmes rather than the whole thing be shut down.
Sometimes though you have to crawl hands and knees through crap to get to the gold.
The first series LITTLE BRITAIN, THE MIGHTY BOOSH and SUMMER HEIGHTS HIGH are excellent BBC3 programmes.
Or are they? BOOSH were already an established comedy duo on the circuit. SHH is an Aussie import – well SHH is an Aussie import. And the best LITTLE BRITAIN scripts started on radio.
I’ve changed my mind – kill them all!
2 pints is still going?
BBC3 is still going?
Get rid. Load of rubbish.
The reason it’s so shit is because they’re trying too hard to impress their ‘demographic’ and they don’t have the balls to put new comedy on bbc2, like they used to. If a comedy’s not quite up to scratch it gets an outing on bbc3 as damage limitation, but then it probably shouldn’t have been made in the first place. everyone loses out by lowering their standards.
Have you thought about making a facebook page of this? You’d probably get thousand of signatures.
It is very important for big CHANGE to take place in UK.
BBC is not benefiting British working class people.
Time has come to claim our Rights from Government,country,freedom from Islam.
No more Aid/Grant to other faith people in UK!!
‘Russell Howard’s Good News was a great advert for eye-gauging’ – Tell me about it. I’ve been left half blind from accidentally catching a glimpse of it the other night. I was caught off guard and forced to take drastic action. Luckily for me I had nothing sharper than my mobile phone to hand and my girlfriend was pretty swift with the remote, otherwise it could have been both eyes.
How many more will have to suffer before something is done?
Good post:) Going to want a good amout of time to think over your blog.
Great site:D Will need a good amout of time to toy with your story!!
Fantastic article!! Going to want a decent amount of time to toy with this job.
What’s BBC3? Never heard of it. At least, I’ve heard of sickmusic – never listened tho – has anyone?
Imagine what it must be like being an intellectual American saddled with programming geared toward the “lower common denominator” on nearly every network and spilling into the subscription-based services. Now, while this might sound a bit odd to those who think the BBC is rubbish, I would gladly fork over five times the license fees you pay for access to ALL the programming and not just the delayed slivers presented on BBC America and (often badly) copied shows we’ve had to endure.
Even the “critically acclaimed” American version of “The Office” is “cheeky” at best, but is severely “dumbed” down to appeal to a wider range of Americans and therefore to the sponsors/advertising that helps keep it on the air. While people think that cable and satellite is a safe haven for something a bit more “high-brow”, sure there are networks like Discovery, TLC and such, but when you get bored with the documentaries and reality shows, what else is there?
By now you might wonder what American, commercial network television gripes have to do with the BBC which is funded essentially by a loosely termed “license fee” which I see as more of a tax and a bit of a spooky one at that considering the old ways they used to enforce it.
The point I was leading up to is that there might be a few ways to look at BBC3′s programming including one that might make it a necessary evil to save the productions of more worthwhile programming among the other channels. From the perspective of someone who has to deal with low-brow crap because that’s what sells in the US, the BBC knows full well the same crap sells in the UK and perhaps does well and by dropping it into a nice, secluded bucket. Those that want to watch it can go to BBC3 and that was my impression of Three since day one…I found this to be a very smart approach rather than spreading stupidity-flavored sprinkles over the entire cake of channels.
Take for example “Two Pints”… For me, this was reminiscent of American shows like Roseanne which shared a similar sit-com flavor to many others across ABC, NBC and CBS. The difference here is that sometimes these shows would be part of prime-time lineups that coincided close or with each other in competition for ratings. In the case of the BBC, this would mean that BBC1, BBC2 and BBC3 would all be subject to an “hour of low-brainpower, so sit back with your lager and take another bong hit…” and so on…
The question now might be “why do we even need that programming secluded there in the first place?” and that should be simple to see based on all the crap programming you’re seeing from America that makes it to the BBC, Channel 4, Channel 5, Dave and ITV, but some UK programming just leaves me saying “WTF?”. There is a big time calling for mindless dribble and slapstick in the UK and the BBC has got to appeal to that audience or face cuts in the majority of good programming they offer elsewhere.
While you all can rightfully argue my opinion on what is “good programming” for your tax dollar, while NOTHING like the BBC would ever be allowed here because the “United States of Jesusland” are still under the influence of the red scare and view anything run by the state as communism, believe me there are millions of us who wish we had a state run, zero commercial system that created programs too numerous to name.
When you boil it all down, if all of the “lower brow” programming was left to your commercial networks, you’d see a rapid decline in license fee payments and/or complaints from people (maybe just from the North, eh? haha) that would be crying the opposite to this argument and then YOUR side will suffer a worse fate than seclusion to BBC3 and I pray it never ends up like us.
Americans and the people of the UK have viewed each other in the wrong light for decades and shows like “Episodes” cracked me up because it’s so true. We view you all as a country of intellectual people with very little room for the dumb BS media content we have do deal with here. On the flipside, you seem to view us as a bunch of yobbos who sit at home blending buckets of KFC and flipping between Springer and Jersey Shore listening to our arteries harden and if you consider the “deep southern US” then you’d be right, but look up North for a minute and even as someone who is only aware of this through a constant barrage of jokes about “Northerners”, you’re going to see where I am coming from real quick.
In the end there needs to be a better balance and I have been VERY vocal when it comes to not only the flavor of programming we have to deal with here, but especially when shows are cancelled because they have content that conflicts with the religious beliefs of the production company, channel, advertisers or all of them. Get this, I was ENRAGED when I found out that TWO very good shows, made in America were cancelled here, but continued to play in Canada and the UK unmolested. THAT speaks volumes to me of what is wrong with the United States and believe me, you all could have it far worse.
I am the owner of “topgearamerica.com” and half expected the BBC to come around and say “hey, give us that back..”, but even though I contacted everyone that I could at the BBC offering to help write the show FREE, nobody cared. I watched the first series of the show and it was like watching bad re-runs of the original show that borrowed from within all the different series going back as far as series 4, I believe. I wrote a comparison to each episode citing the various “bad attempts at copies” and basically just had enough with good shows being brought here and bastardised. Believe me when I say that I am REALLY in tune with what this article is about, but you might want to consider a different attack or suffer a POSSIBLE ripple effect throughout the BBC range.
I say let them have BBC3…Let it thrive as well. This is a necessary evil that helps fund the intellectual and proper programming that you all are rather spoiled by and us Americans HOPE that not only will they beef up BBC America with things like QI and others, but that the iPlayer will be made global as long as it doesn’t affect you all and WE as subscribers can contribute to your programming lineup. Maybe then the UK and USA will finally see we’re on an even keel and our advertising idiots will realize they’re losing, not gaining…
I am not one for joining the Apple cattle drive, but when the BBC said they’d release an iPad application in April that would allow Americans access to the iPlayer, guess who bought a second gen… Yeah.. It has been sitting there waiting ever since… Ok, I might have played a few games on it… haha.
Hell, if I could vote for all the dumb shit we have to be lumped onto one channel or even a range of them, I’d be the first in line…
Pardon some of my run-on mistakes and babble… I was writing this on and off while working and taking calls, so there might be evidence of me getting lost in the fog of thought… An edit button would be brilliant…lol
Apparently everyone ran screaming from such a long post? Nothing? lol